Jo Chol Su, Director-General of the Department of International Organizations of the Foreign Ministry of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, made public the following press statement on March 19:
The U.S. representative to the UN dared find fault with the DPRK at the meeting of the UN Security Council held illegally on March 17.
This time Thomas Greenfield, unaware of genuine human rights and elementary human ethics, revealed her shameful nature utterly devoid of logic and sound thinking.
The U.S. has brought the non-existent “human rights issue” of the DPRK for the discussion of the UN Security Council despite the opposition and concern of the righteous international community. This is a defamation of the UN Charter and a mockery of genuine human rights.
If the U.S. is so worried about the “human rights situation” in the DPRK, it should explain why it is so obsessed with the implementation of the most unethical sanctions against the DPRK in the world.
As for human rights, the U.S. should strictly be judged by the international community for its human rights abuses as it leaves tens of millions of the colored people under the police suppression.
It is the customary behavior of the U.S. to move to the “human rights” arena and try to shake the socialist system chosen by the Korean people if they have nothing to provoke with.
The U.S. held a vile meeting to discuss anti-DPRK “human rights” despite the repeated warnings of the DPRK, selecting high-handed practices instead of human rights, and war instead of peace.
The U.S. moves to shake the DPRK by means of “human rights” will only increase the resentment of the Korean people, and the U.S. will only get irreversible security instability from it.
It is anybody’s guess when this boring action will end. However, the U.S. is surely making a wrong attempt.
Thomas Greenfield will deplore her position as a stooge and servant of the U.S. which is engrossed in interference in the internal affairs of independent sovereign state under the veil of “human rights protection”.
Arms Aid to Ukraine Opposed
A crack appeared in the European anti-Russia “united front” over the Ukrainian crisis and is gradually growing wider. In a
December 30, 2025
A crack appeared in the European anti-Russia “united front” over the Ukrainian crisis and is gradually growing wider. In a
